Our Unique Approach
Section 1:
Capture of biographical and administrative data.
(Employee’s name and the date the form was actioned or completed.)
Traditional
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_b2909dc8d55e4cdab1a206f11af3dfaf~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_436,h_140,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/880753_b2909dc8d55e4cdab1a206f11af3dfaf~mv2.jpg)
Weakness:
Completely manually when either using a pen on a paper form or keying in the details for a e-paper (on-line) form.
Neos HR approach
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_639db220ed4c401d8b996b03bbe925f5~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_451,h_157,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/880753_639db220ed4c401d8b996b03bbe925f5~mv2.jpg)
Solution:
Start with an appropriate data base containing all the biographical data. Now when you open the e-paperless form (user interface), this section will prepopulate
Section 2:
Assessment using criteria and a rating scale.
(Such as “quality of work” assessed against a scale from (say) “unacceptable” to “exceeds expectations”.)
Traditional
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_6c2b475a9f3948febf3edec23dab976e~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_366,h_235,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/880753_6c2b475a9f3948febf3edec23dab976e~mv2.jpg)
Weakness:
The rating scale used for the assessment is highly subjective, with individual managers rating the same criterion differently
Neos HR approach
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_eb5404ab07f44fb7a2fa0e20f322ce45~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_407,h_235,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/880753_eb5404ab07f44fb7a2fa0e20f322ce45~mv2.jpg)
Solution:
Replace the assessment rating scale with behavioural anchored rating statements. This approach of simply selecting from pre-determined behavioural descriptors dramatically increases the consistency of the assessment
Section 3:
The recommendation.
(Sometimes this step is contained in a separate report)
Traditional
Neos HR approach
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_6042ffc740f545e99693e880f7d57638~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_108,h_24,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_6042ffc740f545e99693e880f7d57638~mv2.jpg)
Weakness:
Is independent, and often inconsistent with the assessment. For example, a manager may rate an employee “satisfactory” for three out of five criterion and then recommend an overall rating of “less than average”.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_aca4ce996ef6441f9fc7e63bb5b5d400~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_71,h_63,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_aca4ce996ef6441f9fc7e63bb5b5d400~mv2.jpg)
Solution:
Develop an algorithm to automatically create the recommendation. For example, perhaps you set a minimum of four-out-of-five “satisfactory” assessments before the overall recommendation is deemed “satisfactory”.
Section 4:
The decision.
Traditional
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_69e81f658d5143d8872afe5df345f0c3~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_116,h_47,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_69e81f658d5143d8872afe5df345f0c3~mv2.jpg)
Neos HR approach
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_33c570d1378a437186f86565d1edcca5~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_94,h_58,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_33c570d1378a437186f86565d1edcca5~mv2.jpg)
Weakness:
Often requires multiple signatures, requiring the paper form to physically move from person to person.
Solution:
Allow all decision makers access to the data base so they can electronically review the assessment and recommendation, then make a decision by clicking a hyperlink-button.
Outcomes
Traditional
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_4784f98d21e64b4d94d8341c0f478c05~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_103,h_150,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_4784f98d21e64b4d94d8341c0f478c05~mv2.jpg)
Neos HR approach
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_570212c936a54f74b090b760336074b3~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_71,h_150,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_570212c936a54f74b090b760336074b3~mv2.jpg)
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/880753_2ef1647d0ffa44648de69042902a2967~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_90,h_42,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/880753_2ef1647d0ffa44648de69042902a2967~mv2.jpg)
Weaknesses
-
Poor employee experience
-
Separate forms for each HR process
-
Stand alone/o integration to HRMIS
-
Heavy managerial workload
-
Manual records
-
Inconsistent assessment
-
Poor employee feedback
-
Time delays in approvals
-
No big data analysis
Solution:
-
Excellent employee experience
-
Same user interface for all HR processes
-
Full integration and Point of truth via CSV or API
-
Minimal management workload
-
Electronic records
-
Meaningful and defendable assessment
-
Meaningful employee feedback
-
No time delays in approvals
-
Bid data analysis readily available